Friday, 24 December 2010

NEW POSSIBILITY- new seeker: Reality of Being by Jeanne de Salzmann | Fourth Way | Gurdjieff | Gurdjieff Books

a work take on the christmas story

------------------------------------------------


WINTER SOLSTICE
THE CHRISTMAS STORY
In the darkest nighttime, in the
coldest and most cheerless time
of the year, at the season of the
winter solstice—the Christ child
can be born. It has to be that way
—light in the darkness. The Sun
dies and the Sun is reborn. It is
the same sun that dies and is
reborn, but from time
immemorial this has represented
a mystery. The child that is
reborn, the Christ child, is
something new, something
promised and long awaited, a
messenger from another realm
for whom the highest part of us
waits. And waits in the darkness
for the coming light.
Every part of the Christmas story
has to do with man. Any man:
you, me. It is an account of real
man as he could be—the God-
Man, the Hu-Man—but it is also
the story of man as he is.
Very few, like the Cherubinic
Wanderer of the Middle Ages
recognise that “I must myself
become Mary and give birth to
Christ.” But all of us owe a debt
for the gift of our lives, a “tax”
that will one day have to be paid.
Sometimes we remember that.
In the way we at present live,
each of us is the Inn, where there
is no room for the Christ child to
be born. The Inn his too full, too
busy, there is too much coming
and going, getting and spending.
It has its own life and knows no
other.
And so the Holy Family who
have come to pay their tax can
find no place for the child to be
born except in the manger, the
place where the animals eat.
Bethlehem also means, “the
house of eating.”
Who are the holy family? The as
yet unborn Christ child, and
Mary, his mother. Mary is called
the Virgin and the meaning of
virgin is unused. Mary is also the
name for the sea: the living water
in which higher forms can exist.
Mary represents the unused
energies in us. These are the
higher energies we disregard and
waste during the course of our
lives. Joseph is not actually a part
of the Holy Family. He is that
part of us that is able to recognise
and care for them, value, guard
and keep them. This he does in
the story.
There are only two animals
present at the birth of the Christ
child, the ox and the ass. They
are alike in that they spend their
lives in patient, unremitting toil
for others. They have nothing of
their own.
In that dark night all the world
was oblivious and asleep, save
for some shepherds in a higher
place—“the hillside,” where they
watched their sheep by night.
Because they were awake they
could be present to a mystery
beyond their understanding—
they heard the angels rejoicing at
the birth of Man.
Something of the magic and
mystery of this story has rung
down through the ages and we
can hear it still. Children are not
strangers to this starry night, this
night of lights and music
emerging from the darkness.
Even now there is still that child
in us which is not buried totally
under the grossness, the
sentimentality, and the lies with
which we at Christmas fill our
“Inn.”
The three wise men followed a
star—the inner light reflected
from above—and travelled from
the East, where the sun rises.
They brought gifts for the divine
child. Gold incorruptible for the
King; frankincense, which when
burns ascends in fragrance, for
the God; but for the man, Jesus, a
bitter herb. For any who would
really be like Jesus must taste
that bitterness.
But the wise men could not
remain and they were obliged to
return to their source “by another
way.” They needed to avoid
Herod, the Tetrarch who wished,
and will always wish, to destroy
that which threatens the status
quo. He is also part of us.
The story is told, the year is
ended. Tomorrow the ordinary
light of day will be a fraction
more, the dark a fraction less.
But for a moment the vault of
heaven opened and the wonder
and the glory could be sensed.
Now we are asleep again. Herod
is safe. The cock crows, the dog
barks, the donkey brays. The
noisy, busy life of the Inn begins
all over again.

Thursday, 9 December 2010

The Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKSC 54 (08 December 2010)

The Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKSC 54 (08 December 2010)

*********************************************************************************


VERY IMPORTANT CASE

***************************************************************************


LAW TUTORS NOTE: ACE CASE TO DESPERATE THE DIM FROM THE BRIGHT

Tuesday, 9 November 2010

Anderson, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2553 (03 November 2010)

Anderson, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2553 (03 November 2010)

AN EXCELLENT EXAMPLE OF THE DANGERS OF GETTING IN A MUDDLE

and the need to keep clear notes and records

Monday, 8 November 2010

Phil Woolas loses first part of battle against court ruling - Telegraph

Phil Woolas loses first part of battle against court ruling - Telegraph


matter on paper.

Mr Justice Silber said a decision of the election court dealing with parliamentary election petitions "is not amenable to judicial review because it is a decision of High Court judges sitting in their capacity as High Court judges".

EXACTLY AS I PREDICTED

Friday, 5 November 2010

Racal Communications Ltd, Re [1980] UKHL 5 (03 July 1980)

Racal Communications Ltd, Re [1980] UKHL 5 (03 July 1980)

"f the proper view of the action taken by the Court of Appeal in the instant case is that they purported to exercise on their own behalf that jurisdiction which they concluded Vinelott J. had " renounced ", they were in effect conducting a judicial review of a High Court decision. But it has to be said that they had no power to do that. The Court of Appeal is a member of the Supreme Court of Judicature, but" it is not a member of the High Court " (per Scrutton, L.J. in In re Carroll [1931] 1 K.B. 105, at 107), and all applications, for judicial review must be made to a Divisional Court of the Queen's Bench Division and in the manner prescribed by R.S.C., Order 53, r. 3.

Monday, 1 November 2010

BAILII: Recent Decisions « Current Awareness

BAILII: Recent Decisions « Current Awareness

F, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2243 (17 September 2010)

F, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2243 (17 September 2010)




IMPORTANT CASE*****


In making his ruling that the two-person rule was not satisfied in this case, the learned judge referred to and applied the law on this point as most recently expounded by Thomas LJ in the judgment of this court in R v Hamilton [2007] EWCA Crim 2062.

Wednesday, 22 September 2010

Hai, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2020 (21 September 2010)

Hai, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2020 (21 September 2010): "- Sent using Google Toolbar"

turns on fresh evidencd:

Section 23 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968

and previous inconsistent statement

BAILII: Recent Decisions « Current Awareness

BAILII: Recent Decisions « Current Awareness: "- Sent using Google Toolbar"

Wednesday, 1 September 2010

Ahmed, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 1949 (29 July 2010)

Ahmed, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 1949 (29 July 2010): "- Sent using Google Toolbar"


AGUELY INTERESTING ABORTION CASE, ? OFFENCE KNOWN TO LAW, AS ALLEGED.

Wednesday, 25 August 2010

Regina v Varsani – WLR Daily « Current Awareness

Regina v Varsani – WLR Daily « Current Awareness: "- Sent using Google Toolbar"



Where an offender was convicted of being knowingly concerned in the fraudulent evasion of duty on counterfeit cigarettes, contrary to s 170 of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979, the reference to the retail price of cigarettes “of that description” in s 5(1) of the Tobacco Products Duty Act 1979, as amended, by which the value of the duty was to be calculated, was to the retail price of genuine non-counterfeit cigarettes which were of the same description as the counterfeit ones on which the duty was evaded.”

Monday, 16 August 2010

Friday, 6 August 2010

iGoogle

iGoogle: "- Sent using Google Toolbar"

iGoogle

iGoogle: "- Sent using Google Toolbar"

iGoogle

iGoogle: "- Sent using Google Toolbar"

Thursday, 5 August 2010

Davies, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 1923 (04 August 2010)

Davies, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 1923 (04 August 2010)

interesting case, which of 2 out of control dogs should be destroyed??











i

Wednesday, 28 July 2010

Dunn v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 1823 (27 July 2010)

Dunn v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 1823 (27 July 2010): "- Sent using Google Toolbar"

*****FASCINATING CASE OF ONLY INTELLECTUAL INTEREST BUT USUEFUL FOR THE STUDENT

Wednesday, 14 July 2010

Willett & Anor v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 1620 (13 July 2010)

Willett & Anor v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 1620 (13 July 2010): "- Sent using Google Toolbar"

IMPORTANT JOINT ENTERPRISE CASE, EXAMPLE OF GOOD SENSE

Friday, 25 June 2010

Friday, 18 June 2010

Hussain & Ors v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 1327 (16 June 2010)

Hussain & Ors v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 1327 (16 June 2010): "- Sent using Google Toolbar"

Under the common law of England and Wales it is well established that the trial judge enjoys the discretion whether to permit a defendant to re-open his case at any moment before the jury retires to consider its verdict, for the purpose of adducing further evidence. In Morrison [1911] 6 Cr App R 159, the defence was permitted to adduce further evidenc

Tuesday, 11 May 2010

Crown Prosecution Service v Neish [2010] EWCA Crim 1011 (06 May 2010)

Crown Prosecution Service v Neish [2010] EWCA Crim 1011 (06 May 2010): "- Sent using Google Toolbar"


POC case on delay/postpoement may be interesting if a similar situation arises